↓ Skip to main content

Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x705101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Fletcher, Lisa Hinton, Richard McManus, Oliver Rivero-Arias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 39 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 41 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,678,686
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,502
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,680
of 343,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#45
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.