↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1605 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sune Rubak, Annelli Sandbæk, Torsten Lauritzen, Bo Christensen, Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing is a well-known, scientifically tested method of counselling clients developed by Miller and Rollnick and viewed as a useful intervention strategy in the treatment of lifestyle problems and disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 1%
United Kingdom 15 <1%
Australia 10 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1539 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 382 24%
Student > Bachelor 280 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 192 12%
Researcher 157 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 110 7%
Other 315 20%
Unknown 169 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 403 25%
Psychology 379 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 201 13%
Social Sciences 137 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 4%
Other 202 13%
Unknown 219 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#210,961
of 17,864,600 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#76
of 3,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,011
of 132,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,864,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.