↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1027 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1234 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sune Rubak, Annelli Sandbæk, Torsten Lauritzen, Bo Christensen, Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing is a well-known, scientifically tested method of counselling clients developed by Miller and Rollnick and viewed as a useful intervention strategy in the treatment of lifestyle problems and disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 2%
United Kingdom 15 1%
Australia 10 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 315 26%
Student > Bachelor 210 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 172 14%
Researcher 128 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 90 7%
Other 319 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 354 29%
Psychology 317 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 152 12%
Social Sciences 110 9%
Unspecified 108 9%
Other 193 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#367,079
of 13,643,288 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#181
of 2,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,368
of 120,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,643,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.