↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1493 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1981 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sune Rubak, Annelli Sandbaek, Torsten Lauritzen, Bo Christensen

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing is a well-known, scientifically tested method of counselling clients developed by Miller and Rollnick and viewed as a useful intervention strategy in the treatment of lifestyle problems and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,981 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 1%
United Kingdom 15 <1%
Australia 10 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1916 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 413 21%
Student > Bachelor 314 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 209 11%
Researcher 172 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 126 6%
Other 355 18%
Unknown 392 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 431 22%
Psychology 409 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 231 12%
Social Sciences 141 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 3%
Other 246 12%
Unknown 457 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#300,871
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#108
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308
of 74,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them