↓ Skip to main content

Living donor kidney transplantation: often a missed opportunity

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Living donor kidney transplantation: often a missed opportunity
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x705173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Videha Sharma, Angela Summers, Michael Picton, John Ainsworth, David Van Dellen, Roger Jones, Titus Augustine

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,410,407
of 13,606,441 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#717
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,479
of 214,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#39
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.