↓ Skip to main content

Deprivation and primary care funding in Greater Manchester after devolution: a cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
Title
Deprivation and primary care funding in Greater Manchester after devolution: a cross-sectional analysis
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x705545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica A Lee, Rachel Meacock, Evangelos Kontopantelis, James Matheson, Matthew Gittins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#820,388
of 13,644,402 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#445
of 2,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,301
of 226,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#26
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.