| Title |
Deprivation and primary care funding in Greater Manchester after devolution: a cross-sectional analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x705545 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica A Lee, Rachel Meacock, Evangelos Kontopantelis, James Matheson, Matthew Gittins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 63% |
| Comoros | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 50% |
| Scientists | 14 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,579,441
of 24,972,357 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#762
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,888
of 347,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,972,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.