↓ Skip to main content

Current understanding and implementation of ‘care navigation’ across England: a cross-sectional study of NHS clinical commissioning groups

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
Title
Current understanding and implementation of ‘care navigation’ across England: a cross-sectional study of NHS clinical commissioning groups
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x705569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Tierney, Geoff Wong, Kamal R Mahtani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#692,017
of 13,642,813 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#368
of 2,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,153
of 226,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,642,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.