↓ Skip to main content

The real costs of teaching medical students in general practice: a cost-collection survey of teaching practices across England

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
80 tweeters
Title
The real costs of teaching medical students in general practice: a cost-collection survey of teaching practices across England
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x706553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joe Rosenthal, Robert K McKinley, Chris Smyth, John L Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#253,748
of 13,989,129 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#111
of 3,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,914
of 288,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,989,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.