↓ Skip to main content

Gender incongruence: not representative of current knowledge and evidence, and nor of best practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Gender incongruence: not representative of current knowledge and evidence, and nor of best practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret I White

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Chemistry 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,911,134
of 24,995,611 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,315
of 4,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,113
of 351,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#32
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.