↓ Skip to main content

Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, November 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x706601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J Edwards, Matthew J Ridd, Emily Sanderson, Rebecca K Barnes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,791,812
of 20,423,840 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#890
of 4,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,017
of 427,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#21
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,423,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.