↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of primary healthcare professionals and patients from an area of urban disadvantage: a qualitative study.

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 183)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Experiences of primary healthcare professionals and patients from an area of urban disadvantage: a qualitative study.
Published in
BJGP Open, November 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen19x101676
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Reath, Marlee King, Walter Kmet, Diana O'Halloran, Ronald Brooker, Diana Aspinall, Hani Bittar, Thava Seelan, Michael Burke, Tim Usherwood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#731,165
of 14,348,308 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#21
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,564
of 323,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,348,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them