| Title |
Experiences of primary healthcare professionals and patients from an area of urban disadvantage: a qualitative study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJGP Open, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgpopen19x101676 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Reath, Marlee King, Walter Kmet, Diana O'Halloran, Ronald Brooker, Diana Aspinall, Hani Bittar, Thava Seelan, Michael Burke, Tim Usherwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,823,968
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#107
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,409
of 469,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.