↓ Skip to main content

Role of the GP in the management of patients with self-harm behaviour: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
76 tweeters
Title
Role of the GP in the management of patients with self-harm behaviour: a systematic review
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x708257
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faraz Mughal, M Isabela Troya, Lisa Dikomitis, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Nadia Corp, Opeyemi O Babatunde

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#201,052
of 14,369,098 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#88
of 3,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,077
of 171,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,369,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.