↓ Skip to main content

Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 3,260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
103 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x709433
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Round, Carolynn Gildea, Mark Ashworth, Henrik Møller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 841. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,703
of 15,146,254 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 3,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#626
of 226,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,146,254 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.