↓ Skip to main content

Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x710993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian MacKenna, Helen J Curtis, Alex J Walker, Richard Croker, Seb Bacon, Ben Goldacre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#266,071
of 15,576,437 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#113
of 3,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,146
of 255,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.