↓ Skip to main content

Cancer incidence following a high-normal platelet count: cohort study using electronic healthcare records from English primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters
Title
Cancer incidence following a high-normal platelet count: cohort study using electronic healthcare records from English primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x710957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke TA Mounce, Willie Hamilton, Sarah ER Bailey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#168,710
of 15,637,225 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#66
of 3,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,294
of 187,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,637,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.