↓ Skip to main content

Should we, can we, halt the rise in prescribing for pain and distress?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
215 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Should we, can we, halt the rise in prescribing for pain and distress?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x712217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Byng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#146,566
of 16,628,353 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#54
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,734
of 305,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,628,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.