↓ Skip to main content

Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x712793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Kingston, Rhiannon Griffiths, Hayley Hutchings, Alison Porter, Ian Russell, Helen Snooks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,183,954
of 17,009,769 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,018
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,325
of 316,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#33
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,009,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.