Title |
Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x713057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander Pate, Richard Emsley, Tjeerd van Staa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,415,262
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,164
of 4,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,367
of 415,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#30
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.