↓ Skip to main content

Changing media depictions of remote consulting in COVID-19: analysis of UK newspapers

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
98 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Changing media depictions of remote consulting in COVID-19: analysis of UK newspapers
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilly Mroz, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Alex Rushforth, Trisha Greenhalgh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#303,536
of 16,631,923 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#127
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,321
of 349,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,631,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.