| Title |
Prevalence and Predictors of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Middle-Aged Adults: Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amandeep Khatter, Frank Moriarty, Mark Ashworth, Stevo Durbaba, Patrick Redmond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 20% |
| Ireland | 6 | 14% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,179,781
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#533
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,854
of 457,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.