Title |
The impact on general practice of prescribing assisted dying drugs
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp21x717605 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claud Regnard, Carol Davis, Katherine Sleeman, Philip Williams, Ana Worthington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 2 | 67% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,736
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,860
of 440,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#71
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.