| Title |
Home monitoring by pulse oximetry of primary care patients with COVID-19: a pilot randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin Smit, Roderick P Venekamp, Loeke A Krol, Geert-Jan Geersing, Lisette Schoonhoven, Karin AH Kaasjager, Frans H Rutten, Dorien LM Zwart |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| Peru | 1 | 11% |
| Comoros | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#609,470
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#253
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,353
of 470,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.