@NadiaKuftinoff @AHSNNetwork @tara_donnelly1 Lively debate, need more evidence. Maybe now drugs and gadgets are better, it's worth doing. Maybe they want to sell us more drugs and gadgets... https://t.co/wuTI7kmtUQ https://t.co/rP8RLnobMW Yes argument fr
And on top of this all - something that NO ONE SEEMS TO MENTION ANYWHERE - is that AF screening >65 years is currently not recommended because we are unsure of the risks/benefits https://t.co/XqokHC49wd https://t.co/q24z1MTL7o
@prof_mant @SAFER_Study @drjohnm John and Andrew @AndrewFoy82 , Jonathan has just published an article in @BJGPjournal Should we screen for atrial fibrillation? https://t.co/vaA91Z5irm @cardiobrief @matthewherper
@pash22 @drjohnm @AndrewFoy82 @prof_mant @felly500 @MarshallProf What are your views on https://t.co/bXqdRGi8pY SAFER study will be great to answer this.
@shekhawatgp @PeteWaddingham @AHSN_YandH @AliveCor Also piloting in Medway. However do we really have quality evidence that screening improves outcomes. https://t.co/3Uaclsu9Nc
@MFAminGP @JulsReynolds https://t.co/tWY8bCEtK2 my understanding is that the evidence for screening is still very limited? @edwinoutnback
Should GPs screen for atrial fibrillation? https://t.co/HsevhqsCQr https://t.co/tEdEAmaUw6
RT @DrBathori: Should we screen for #afib ? https://t.co/ma5zPN79n5
Should we screen for #afib ? https://t.co/ma5zPN79n5
Screening for atrial fibrillation? With its increased prevalence, newer treatments and inexpensive screening devices https://t.co/HsevhqsCQr