↓ Skip to main content

Implementing change in primary care practice: lessons from a mixed-methods evaluation of a frailty initiative

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 100)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Implementing change in primary care practice: lessons from a mixed-methods evaluation of a frailty initiative
Published in
BJGP Open, March 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101421
Authors

Carol Bryce, Joanna Fleming, Joanne Reeve

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,891,691
of 11,729,435 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#48
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,390
of 269,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,729,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.