↓ Skip to main content

Hypotensive effects of hawthorn for patients with diabetes taking prescription drugs: a randomised controlled trial.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Hypotensive effects of hawthorn for patients with diabetes taking prescription drugs: a randomised controlled trial.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walker AF, Marakis G, Simpson E, Hope JL, Robinson PA, Hassanein M, Simpson HC, Ann F Walker, Georgios Marakis, Eleanor Simpson, Jessica L Hope, Paul A Robinson, Mohamed Hassanein, Hugh CR Simpson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 2%
Student > Bachelor 1 1%
Researcher 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,324,772
of 13,316,854 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#666
of 2,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,647
of 231,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,316,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.