#Evidence suggests that #primarycare access to #diagnostic #testing for #Cancer results in faster time to test and better patient and clinician #satisfaction with comparable #diagnostic outcomes https://t.co/MSfQk2XdOV @BJGPjournal @CFrieders @OxPrimaryC
@sorenworsoe @Fredeolesen @SSTSundhed @regionerne @regeringDK Er det et forkert link? Jeg kommer i hvert fald ind på en editorial fra 2009. Jeg tænker, du mente dette systematiske review fra 2018. Væsentlig reference btw! https://t.co/L2ueWuGkkq
Very happy Oxford can not only support but pioneer this, much needed, pathway, well done guys!
RT @WalesCancerNet: A huge thank you to @BrianDNicholson and his team for presenting their work on the Oxford Scan pathway. Further details…
RT @WalesCancerNet: A huge thank you to @BrianDNicholson and his team for presenting their work on the Oxford Scan pathway. Further details…
RT @WalesCancerNet: A huge thank you to @BrianDNicholson and his team for presenting their work on the Oxford Scan pathway. Further details…
A huge thank you to @BrianDNicholson and his team for presenting their work on the Oxford Scan pathway. Further details on their work can be found here: https://t.co/9HBtdTGqBu https://t.co/LZKlXLzOgg https://t.co/TQrcwhqW5S https://t.co/tIlf05lFiK https:
RT @Fredeolesen: Der er kortere ventetid, smidigere forløb, samme kvalitet, større patienttilfredshed og penge at spare ved at udbygge prak…
RT @Fredeolesen: Der er kortere ventetid, smidigere forløb, samme kvalitet, større patienttilfredshed og penge at spare ved at udbygge prak…
Det er spændende! @regeringDK og @regionerne kan sikre ensartet adgang i hele landet til diagnostik hos praktiserende speciallæger lige bag @Plolaeger og sikre færre sygehusforløb. #sundpol
Der er kortere ventetid, smidigere forløb, samme kvalitet, større patienttilfredshed og penge at spare ved at udbygge praksis’ direkte adgang til diagnostiske test. Et apropos til rigsrev. kritik af ‘jo før jo bedre’ indsatsen i DK #sundpol @cancer_dk http
RT @drnrjones: Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes https://t.co/XMmTmSVnqE Great…
Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes https://t.co/XMmTmSVnqE Great to hear @DrRichardRoope talking about cancer diagnosis in primary care and citing our paper @BrianDNicholson
RT @BJGPjournal: Direct access cancer testing performs as well as, and on some measures better than, consultant-triaged testing, leading to…
And if it really existed we could then get the data to prove GP no worse than specialist! (& even, just maybe, better 😊) #GP #cancerdiagnosis #GP gut instinct
Direct access cancer testing performs as well as, and on some measures better than, consultant-triaged testing, leading to appropriate referrals, and patient and GP satisfaction https://t.co/prRxiAcisb https://t.co/q0yz3y9knc
Prompt #cancer diagnosis - Is it better to allow #GP direct access to tests, or rely on specialists to decide? Double gatekeeping doesn't add benefit. GP direct access no worse. https://t.co/oCxIRGnXkX
RT @elunedkilkenny: @campaignforleo @SimonHarrisTD Giving GPs direct access to cancer testing is appropriate and would reduce delays in…
RT @elunedkilkenny: @campaignforleo @SimonHarrisTD Giving GPs direct access to cancer testing is appropriate and would reduce delays in…
Det er helt rigtigt. Det burde være muligt at henvise til diagnostisk uden hospitalets læger. Man kan led dianosriskerne om at udrede patienterne hurtigt og de praktiserende læger overtage behandling, med mindre det er udpræget hospitalsopgaver som kræft.
RT @elunedkilkenny: @campaignforleo @SimonHarrisTD Giving GPs direct access to cancer testing is appropriate and would reduce delays in…
@campaignforleo @SimonHarrisTD Giving GPs direct access to cancer testing is appropriate and would reduce delays in diagnosis so why do public patients have to sit on @HSELive OPD waiting lists? #resourceGP https://t.co/DsNEXl4znd
RT @Fredeolesen: Lad os bare udtrykke det endnu klarere:dobbeltgate-keeping i form af visiterende forundersøgelser efter en henvisning er o…
Lad os bare udtrykke det endnu klarere:dobbeltgate-keeping i form af visiterende forundersøgelser efter en henvisning er oftest et bureaukratisk, ventetidsforlængende, fordyrende, kvalitetsforringende og invaliderende monster, som har fået alt for stor pla
RT @PVedsted: At lave "dobbelt gatekeeping" giver ikke bedre henvisningsresultater end at give direkte adgang for egen læge til undersøgels…
RT @PVedsted: At lave "dobbelt gatekeeping" giver ikke bedre henvisningsresultater end at give direkte adgang for egen læge til undersøgels…
RT @PVedsted: At lave "dobbelt gatekeeping" giver ikke bedre henvisningsresultater end at give direkte adgang for egen læge til undersøgels…
At lave "dobbelt gatekeeping" giver ikke bedre henvisningsresultater end at give direkte adgang for egen læge til undersøgelsen - derimod giver direkte adgang fra egen læge bedre tilfredshed og kortere ventetider https://t.co/2wRvOz8dlC
RT @mmeatock: Evidence strengthening arguement for imptoving GP access to hospital investigations. Direct access cancer testing in primary…
RT @mmeatock: Evidence strengthening arguement for imptoving GP access to hospital investigations. Direct access cancer testing in primary…
RT @mmeatock: Evidence strengthening arguement for imptoving GP access to hospital investigations. Direct access cancer testing in primary…
Evidence strengthening arguement for imptoving GP access to hospital investigations. Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes https://t.co/ADlHDSRAc5
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
RT @CFrieders: Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJ…
Excellent start to a Tuesday morning: our new systematic review on direct access cancer testing in primary care is out in BJGP! Read it here while still hot off the press 🔥 #cancer #primarycare #cancerresearch @BrianDNicholson @OxPrimaryCare @BJGPjournal h