| Title |
Books: The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President: Assessing Dangerousness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x699269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosemary Field |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Maldives | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 94% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#765,525
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#329
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,218
of 352,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.