↓ Skip to main content

Complementary medicine use, views, and experiences: a national survey in England

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Complementary medicine use, views, and experiences: a national survey in England
Published in
BJGP Open, November 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101614
Authors

Debbie Sharp, Ava Lorenc, Richard Morris, Gene Feder, Paul Little, Sandra Hollinghurst, Stewart W Mercer, Hugh MacPherson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#120,267
of 12,297,057 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#1
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,908
of 225,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,297,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them