| Title |
Complementary medicine use, views, and experiences: a national survey in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJGP Open, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101614 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debbie Sharp, Ava Lorenc, Richard Morris, Gene Feder, Paul Little, Sandra Hollinghurst, Stewart W Mercer, Hugh MacPherson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 54% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 75% |
| Scientists | 11 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 15% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#383,376
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#9
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,850
of 359,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.