↓ Skip to main content

Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 2,664)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
135 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polly Duncan, Christie Cabral, Deborah McCahon, Bruce Guthrie, Matthew J Ridd

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 38%
Unspecified 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#112,826
of 12,680,088 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#45
of 2,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,114
of 225,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.