↓ Skip to main content

Using n-of-1 trials as a clinical tool to improve prescribing.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Using n-of-1 trials as a clinical tool to improve prescribing.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikles CJ, Clavarino AM, Del Mar CB, C Jane Nikles, Alexandra M Clavarino, Chris B Del Mar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 10 13%
Professor 8 11%
Unspecified 8 11%
Other 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Unspecified 14 18%
Psychology 14 18%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,536,824
of 13,617,860 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#762
of 2,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,056
of 265,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#23
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.