Title |
Are UK primary care teams formally identifying patients for palliative care before they die?
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x641465 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nadine Harrison, Debbie Cavers, Christine Campbell, Scott A Murray |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 188 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Other | 39 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 21% |
Psychology | 12 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#683,892
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#296
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,530
of 163,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.