↓ Skip to main content

Use of multiple inflammatory marker tests in primary care: using Clinical Practice Research Datalink to evaluate accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Use of multiple inflammatory marker tests in primary care: using Clinical Practice Research Datalink to evaluate accuracy
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Watson, Hayley E Jones, Jonathan Banks, Penny Whiting, Chris Salisbury, Willie Hamilton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#138,173
of 13,232,346 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#57
of 2,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,312
of 179,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.