↓ Skip to main content

Adapting diabetes medication for low carbohydrate management of type 2 diabetes: a practical guide

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,840)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
427 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Adapting diabetes medication for low carbohydrate management of type 2 diabetes: a practical guide
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Campbell Murdoch, David Unwin, David Cavan, Mark Cucuzzella, Mahendra Patel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 427 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 321. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#34,847
of 13,243,795 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#698
of 174,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.