↓ Skip to main content

Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x707117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne M Finucane, Deborah Davydaitis, Zoe Horseman, Emma Carduff, Paul Baughan, Julia Tapsfield, Juliet A Spiller, Richard Meade, Brigid Lydon, Ian M Thompson, Kirsty J Boyd, Scott A Murray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#298,842
of 14,562,071 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#131
of 3,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,303
of 279,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,562,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.