Title |
Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x707117 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne M Finucane, Deborah Davydaitis, Zoe Horseman, Emma Carduff, Paul Baughan, Julia Tapsfield, Juliet A Spiller, Richard Meade, Brigid Lydon, Ian M Thompson, Kirsty J Boyd, Scott A Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 46 | 58% |
Australia | 3 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 53 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 23% |
Scientists | 7 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#605,027
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#253
of 4,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,235
of 467,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.