↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the role of GPs’ gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,481)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
98 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
263 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the role of GPs’ gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x712301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Friedemann Smith, Sarah Drew, Sue Ziebland, Brian D Nicholson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 263 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Psychology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 970. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,316
of 16,260,086 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 3,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#559
of 302,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,260,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.