Title |
Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x712793 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark Kingston, Rhiannon Griffiths, Hayley Hutchings, Alison Porter, Ian Russell, Helen Snooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 69% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 27% |
Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,441,754
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,501
of 4,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,492
of 411,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#39
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.