| Title |
Post-bariatric surgery nutritional follow-up in primary care: a population-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen M Parretti, Anuradhaa Subramanian, Nicola J Adderley, Sally Abbott, Abd A Tahrani, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 65% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 35% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#563,819
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#231
of 4,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,499
of 524,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.