↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in health-related quality of life: repeated cross-sectional study of trends in general practice survey data

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Inequalities in health-related quality of life: repeated cross-sectional study of trends in general practice survey data
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vishalie Shah, Jonathan Stokes, Matt Sutton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#869,726
of 17,180,396 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#433
of 3,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,711
of 382,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.